The Buddha taught an Eightfold Path in which both samadhi and action, vision and livelihood, effort and impulse, have their place. We may conceptualise what we do as doing or as non-doing; it does not matter. We can say that ideas of practice, meditation, charity, study and training are self-power while reciting the name and visualising the Pure Land are other power - but what is the difference really? The Buddha Way cannot be so easily divided against itself.

The essential thing is to allow ourselves to be helped and to allow ourselves to feel grateful and to allow ourselves to be moved. All will reaches its consununation in willingness, but it may take a little will sometimes to get to that point. I remember years ago I used to play chess. There are two ways to play chess - calculation and intuition. Sometimes you calculate: if I move this piece, he will probably move that one and then I could do this.. or I could do that.. and so on. It works, up to a point. After one has been putting a lot of energy into calculating moves for a time, you may suddenly realise that you have seen a perfect move without any calculation at all. Intuition has suddenly unaccountably come into play. It feels quite different. For a little while one plays with a certain confidence (or faith). One calculates less and allows the game to play itself, as it were. Then disaster. It all falls apart. The intuitive source, whatever it may be, deserts. At that point there is nothing for it but to go back to working it all out from scratch again. Then, when we have begun to forget about it, the intuitive genius mysteriously creeps up on us again.

Calculation and intuition thus each feed each other. If one never made the effort involved in calculation and thought that good play would somehow just happen to you, you would be sure to be disappointed. On the other hand, if you are not willing to slip into the flow when it starts to burgeon, you will never make the best play. Calculation is a bit like self power. Intuition is other power. 0 course, we can be clever with words and say, what is the 'self in self-power? and we would be right to do so in a way, because none of the power that we call self is really our own. But as a makeshift, these terms work. They help guide our lives. Used in this light, non-dogmatic sense, they are useful. I think this is how the Buddha used words. I do not think that he was a scholar playing with clever definitions. He spoke the language of ordinary folk. So at this ordinary level, self power and other power dance together and we must accept the grace that comes and accept its absences too. Namo Amida Buddha.